C175 Data Management Foundations Practice Questions - Set 3 - Part 1

Correct Answer: Self-reflection

Self-reflection is the process of examining one's own thoughts and motives. A premise supports reasoning, deduction is a method of reasoning, and inferences are conclusions.

Correct Answer: Inductive reasoning

Inductive reasoning leads to conclusions that are likely but not certain. Deductive reasoning leads to conclusions that are guaranteed, while causal reasoning and analogical reasoning involve specific methods of analysis.

Correct Answer: Begging the question

Begging the question occurs when an argument assumes the conclusion without providing evidence. The other options are different types of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Analogical reasoning

Analogical reasoning draws conclusions based on similarities between two different things. Deductive and inductive reasoning are broader methods, while hypothetical reasoning involves testing hypotheses.

Correct Answer: Statement

A statement is a sentence that can be either true or false. A premise supports reasoning, inferences are conclusions, and assumptions are taken for granted.

Correct Answer: False dichotomy

A false dichotomy presents two options as the only choices when others exist. The other options are different types of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Enthymeme

An enthymeme is an argument with at least one unstated premise. Non-arguments lack reasoning, reports provide information, and descriptions aim to create a mental image.

Correct Answer: Inductive reasoning

Inductive reasoning seeks to infer general conclusions based on specific instances. Deductive reasoning leads to certain conclusions, while analogical and causal reasoning involve different methods of analysis.

Correct Answer: Straw person

The straw person fallacy misrepresents an argument to make it easier to refute. The other options are different types of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Hypothetical reasoning

Hypothetical reasoning tests a hypothesis to determine its accuracy. Deductive and inductive reasoning are broader methods, while causal reasoning analyzes cause-effect relationships.

Correct Answer: Deductive reasoning

Deductive reasoning draws conclusions from a general rule or principle. Inductive reasoning works in the opposite direction, while analogical and causal reasoning involve different methods of analysis.

Correct Answer: Faulty analogy

A faulty analogy occurs when a conclusion is drawn from a flawed comparison between two things. The other options are different types of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Assumption

An assumption is an unstated belief that supports reasoning. Premises are explicit supports for conclusions, while inferences and conclusions follow from reasoning.

Correct Answer: Straw person

The straw person fallacy misrepresents an argument to make it easier to refute. The other options are different types of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Hypothetical reasoning

Hypothetical reasoning involves forming and testing a hypothesis to determine its accuracy. Deductive and inductive reasoning are broader methods, while causal reasoning analyzes cause-effect relationships.

Correct Answer: Statement

A statement is a sentence that can be either true or false. Premises support reasoning, inferences are conclusions, and assumptions are taken for granted.

Correct Answer: Post hoc fallacy

The post hoc fallacy assumes causation based solely on the sequence of events. The other options are different types of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Analogical reasoning

Analogical reasoning infers characteristics based on similarities. Deductive reasoning leads to certain conclusions, while inductive reasoning looks for probable conclusions and hypothetical reasoning tests hypotheses.

Correct Answer: Assumptions

Assumptions are unstated or hidden beliefs that support reasoning in an argument. Premises are explicitly stated supports, inferences are conclusions, and conclusions follow from reasoning.

Correct Answer: Ad hominem

An ad hominem fallacy attacks the individual making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself. The other options are different types of fallacies.