C175 Data Management Foundations Practice Questions - Set 3 - Part 3

Correct Answer: Critical thinking

Critical thinking involves evaluating arguments and reasoning to make informed decisions.

Correct Answer: Post hoc fallacy

The post hoc fallacy assumes causation based solely on sequential events. Other options are different kinds of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Inductive reasoning

Inductive reasoning seeks to infer general conclusions based on specific instances. Deductive reasoning leads to certain conclusions, while causal and analogical reasoning involve different methods of analysis.

Correct Answer: Appeal to the people

The appeal to the people fallacy assumes something is true because it is widely supported. The other options are different types of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Inductive reasoning

Inductive reasoning draws probable conclusions based on evidence. Deductive reasoning leads to guaranteed conclusions, while causal and analogical reasoning are specific approaches.

Correct Answer: Reasoning

Reasoning is the mental process of drawing conclusions based on reasons. Inferences are conclusions, premises support reasoning, and conclusions follow from reasoning.

Correct Answer: Ad hominem

An ad hominem fallacy attacks the individual making the argument rather than the argument itself. The other options represent different types of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Post hoc fallacy

The post hoc fallacy assumes causation based solely on the sequence of events. The other options are different types of fallacies.

Correct Answer: Inductive reasoning

Inductive reasoning seeks to infer general conclusions based on specific cases. Deductive reasoning works from general principles, while analogical and causal reasoning involve their distinct approaches.

Correct Answer: Causal reasoning

Causal reasoning involves establishing the relationship between entities and identifying causation. Deductive and inductive reasoning are broader methods, while analogical reasoning involves comparisons.